Skip to content
Getting a project through reviewLesson 10 of 32

Academy/Architectural Review

Denials

What a valid architectural review denial has to contain, and why "no" by itself often is not enough.

A lawful denial is never just "no." Where a state has legislated (California, Florida, and Texas are researched here), a denial must be in writing, explain the reason, and tell the owner how to challenge it, sometimes on a strict deadline. A denial with no reason and no appeal path is often a due process problem, not a final answer. Check your own state's statute and your declaration.

01

What a lawful denial has to say

In California, a disapproval has to be a written decision, not a verbal one at a meeting or a text message from the committee chair.

"A decision on a proposed change shall be in writing. If a proposed change is disapproved, the written decision shall include both an explanation of why the proposed change is disapproved and a description of the procedure for reconsideration."

Source: California Civil Code Section 4765, State of California

Texas builds in the same idea with more mechanical detail. A denial must be sent by certified mail, hand delivery, or electronic delivery, must "describe the basis for the denial in reasonable detail," and must tell the owner about the right to request a hearing before the board within 30 days.

Whether a written explanation, a reconsideration path, or a hearing deadline applies to your denial depends on your state and your declaration. Confirm what your own state's statute requires before treating a bare "denied" as the end of the conversation.

02

A denial still has to trace back to real authority

A committee can only deny what it had the power to review in the first place. Its authority to judge size, type, or appearance is "permitted only to the extent that the authority is specifically stated or reasonably inferred… in the declaration of covenants." If the declaration is silent on a category, a denial in that category is, at minimum, contestable.

Even within its real authority, the standard for the decision itself is not "the committee did not like it." California requires that the decision "may not be unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious," a good faith standard aimed at the process, not just the outcome.

03

What it can cost to get this wrong

In Florida, a board or committee that blocks an owner's declared rights carelessly is one thing. Blocking them unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully is another.

"If the association or any architectural, construction improvement, or other such similar committee of the association should unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully infringe upon or impair the rights and privileges set forth in the declaration of covenants... the adversely affected parcel owner is entitled to recover damages caused by such infringement or impairment, including any costs and reasonable attorney fees."

Source: Florida Statutes Section 720.3035, State of Florida

This specific remedy is Florida's. Other states set their own consequences for a denial that oversteps the committee's authority. Ask your association's attorney what applies where you sit before you deny anything you are not confident the declaration actually lets you deny.

Check yourself

Answer before you read the explanation, recalling it is what makes it stick.

A California owner's paint request is disapproved. State law requires the written decision to include what?

A Texas architectural review authority denies a fence request. How must the owner be notified?

A Florida board unreasonably, knowingly, and willfully blocks an owner's declared architectural right. What can the owner recover?

Sources

Architectural Review

Next, learn what to do when a denial like this lands on your desk: how and when to appeal it.

Whether a denial must be in writing, what it must explain, and whether there is a deadline to challenge it vary by state and by your own declaration. Confirm both before treating any denial as final.